Re: Creationism in the UK (Utley v Dawkins)

From: Michael Roberts (topper@robertschirk.u-net.com)
Date: Thu Apr 04 2002 - 15:17:10 EST

  • Next message: Shuan Rose: "RE: Thoughts on the implications of evolution as a means of creation"

    For a Brit to know much about ICR and AIG they have to be odd, weird and
    pecular! Arthur is none of those.

    Michael
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "John (Burgy) Burgeson" <hoss_radbourne@hotmail.com>
    To: <jdac@alphalink.com.au>
    Cc: <asa@calvin.edu>
    Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 7:48 PM
    Subject: Re: Creationism in the UK (Utley v Dawkins)

    > >>The problem with Arthur Peacocke is that his views on the incarnation
    and
    > resurrection and his panetheism are such that they are more likely to win
    > converts for YEC among the susceptible than the reverse.>>
    >
    > Reading Peacock, I agree. BTW, I am advised offline that in a recent
    > encounter with Peacock it was evident that he knew almost 0 about our ICR
    > friends. So I stand corrected on my earlier comment.
    >
    > JB
    >
    > _________________________________________________________________
    > Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
    >
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Apr 04 2002 - 16:54:19 EST