Re: Creationism in the UK (Utley v Dawkins)

From: John (Burgy) Burgeson (hoss_radbourne@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu Apr 04 2002 - 13:48:22 EST

Next message: Allen Roy: "Re: Creationism in the UK (Utley v Dawkins)"

Previous message: John (Burgy) Burgeson: "Re: Current Events"
Maybe in reply to: Shuan Rose: "Creationism in the UK (Utley v Dawkins)"
Next in thread: Michael Roberts: "Re: Creationism in the UK (Utley v Dawkins)"
Reply: Michael Roberts: "Re: Creationism in the UK (Utley v Dawkins)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>>The problem with Arthur Peacocke is that his views on the incarnation and
resurrection and his panetheism are such that they are more likely to win
converts for YEC among the susceptible than the reverse.>>

Reading Peacock, I agree. BTW, I am advised offline that in a recent
encounter with Peacock it was evident that he knew almost 0 about our ICR
friends. So I stand corrected on my earlier comment.

_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com

Next message: Allen Roy: "Re: Creationism in the UK (Utley v Dawkins)"
Previous message: John (Burgy) Burgeson: "Re: Current Events"
Maybe in reply to: Shuan Rose: "Creationism in the UK (Utley v Dawkins)"
Next in thread: Michael Roberts: "Re: Creationism in the UK (Utley v Dawkins)"
Reply: Michael Roberts: "Re: Creationism in the UK (Utley v Dawkins)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Apr 04 2002 - 13:48:40 EST