RE: Creationism in the UK (Utley v Dawkins)

From: Shuan Rose (shuanr@boo.net)
Date: Thu Apr 04 2002 - 12:54:50 EST

  • Next message: John (Burgy) Burgeson: "Re: Thanks x10^6 - Process Theeology"

    I I was thinking of Kansas , which tried but did not succceed in banning
    evolution. They merely made the teaching of it optional.Local school boards
    can decide whether to teach evolution, or the big bang . Read all about
    this at

    http://www.cnn.com/2000/US/03/08/creationism.vs.evolution/#r

     -----Original Message-----
    From: Woodward Norm Civ WRALC/TIEDM [mailto:Norm.Woodward@robins.af.mil]
    Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 1:32 PM
    To: Shuan Rose; Asa
    Subject: RE: Creationism in the UK (Utley v Dawkins)

      (author unknown)

      Mr. Colluphid ( a Secular Web moderator from England) is dismayed by the
    thought that there could possibly be in cool Britannia a secondary school
    that is deficent in the teaching of evolution. He should try living in the
    good ol' USA where one state has outright banned the teaching of evolution
    in high school and several states are considering such a ban

      Does anyone know which state the writer is referring to? I think there is
    that “teaching/indoctrinating” confusion is occurring again.

      BTW, why is it that us Fundies are always taking the heat about YEC?

      Doesn’t the Jewish calendar indicate that we are only 5762 years from t=0?

      Norm Woodward

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Apr 04 2002 - 13:09:17 EST