Re: BIBLE: Marcus Borg

From: Walter Hicks (wallyshoes@mindspring.com)
Date: Wed Mar 27 2002 - 18:29:05 EST

Next message: Cmekve@aol.com: "Re: Current Events"

Previous message: bivalve: "Re: Brachiators On Our family Tree? (Common ancestry - directevidence?)"
In reply to: Robert Schneider: "Re: BIBLE: Marcus Borg"
Next in thread: Howard J. Van Till: "Re: BIBLE: Marcus Borg"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Robert Schneider wrote:

> The only information about the resurrection, he would point
> out, comes from the testimony of believers, and that on this topic the NT
> writings amount to "hearsay evidence" in the legal sense. There is no
> independent confirming evidence

I'm trying to imagine a NONbeliever who would say that Jesus rose from
the dead.
Would that not be a rather bizarre thing?

Walt

-- 
===================================
Walt Hicks <wallyshoes@mindspring.com>
 
In any consistent theory, there must
exist true but not provable statements.
(Godel's Theorem)
You can only find the truth with logic 
If you have already found the truth
without it. (G.K. Chesterton)
===================================

Next message: Cmekve@aol.com: "Re: Current Events"
Previous message: bivalve: "Re: Brachiators On Our family Tree? (Common ancestry - directevidence?)"
In reply to: Robert Schneider: "Re: BIBLE: Marcus Borg"
Next in thread: Howard J. Van Till: "Re: BIBLE: Marcus Borg"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 27 2002 - 18:28:14 EST