Dr. Collins, why should the relatedness of living things point more to
evolution than to a common Designer with distinct creational categories?
Musical notes, for example, do not evolve one from another. They have
relatedness, but they come from a Composer.
An author may write many books, and there may be relatedness between them,
but one book did not evolve from the other. The connection was in the mind
of the author, etc.
Why could this not be true for living organisms? Horses may have many
similarities with catfish.
Could not the Designer make both using similar ideas without having one
evolve from the other?
Is the total number of genes in humans still around 30,000?
Allen Roy
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Mar 26 2002 - 22:53:43 EST