Thank you, Bob. I'll check it out.
Troy
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Schneider" <rjschn39@bellsouth.net>
To: <asa@calvin.edu>
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 6:58 AM
Subject: Re: The flood and the deep - rambling thoughts
> Troy,
>
> It has been pointed out many times that there is not enough natural
> water on this earth to cover all the high mountains, and creation
scientists
> have refrained from positing water miraculously created and then after the
> flood disposed of by God. A good review of the falsifying evidence can be
> found in Paul Seely's article, "Creation Science Takes Psalm 104:6-9 Out
of
> Context," PSCF 51:3, p. 170-174 (S 1999). Check the ASA web site and see
if
> it is on line.
>
> Bob Schneider
> rjschn39@bellsouth.net
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Troy Elliott Eckhardt" <SpamFilter@BizTaxPros.com>
> To: <asa@calvin.edu>
> Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2002 11:25 PM
> Subject: The flood and the deep - rambling thoughts
>
>
> > If the flood was literal and global (as I believe it was), where did the
> > water come from? Ice caps? Is our current geography a post-flood
> > phenomenon, such that melted ice caps could have covered all land?
> >
> > Did the water come from "the deep?" Where is that water now? Is "the
> deep"
> > a literal celestial ocean?
> >
> > What are your thoughts?
> >
> > Troy
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 18 2002 - 10:23:22 EST