Michael Roberts wrote:
>
> What is current naturalist science?
The material that is presented on this listserve about evolution or what
may be found on origins.org.
> >
> > If, on the other hand, you believe that the Bible is infallible, then
> > you have reject the claims of science.
> This is sheer nonsense, over the last 400 years or more many have believed
> both the claims of science and the infallibility of the Bible. I am one, so
> are most in the ASA (if not all) and in Christians in Science and the group
> for convicts down under (sorry Jon). The vast majority reputable
> evangelicals in the 19th century eg Warfield Hodge, Sedgwick, Hitchcock et
To which I say "poppycock". You can make anything "infallible" if you
just reinterpret the Bible every time that it does not hold water -- and
call it theology. Reality is that the Bible is inspired writing but it
does, in fact, have errors within it. Where does the Bible itself claim
to be infallible?
Walt
>
===================================
Walt Hicks <wallyshoes@mindspring.com>
In any consistent theory, there must
exist true but not provable statements.
(Godel's Theorem)
You can only find the truth with logic
If you have already found the truth
without it. (G.K. Chesterton)
===================================
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 11 2002 - 18:05:41 EST