No
----- Original Message -----
From: "george murphy" <gmurphy@raex.com>
To: <vernon.jenkins@virgin.net>
Cc: "M.B.Roberts" <topper@robertschirk.u-net.com>; <asa@calvin.edu>
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 1:30 AM
Subject: Re: Watershed
> Vernon Jenkins wrote:
>
> > M.B.Roberts wrote:
> > >
> > > Vernon
> > >
> > > I am sorry but I find your treatment of the Bible misguided and
> > > offensive. I did once refer your work to the unrude and not unlearned
> > > and got a ribald response.
> >
> > Bearing in mind that I deal only in self-evident truths, I am at a loss
> > to know why any 'lover of truth' (the Lord's definition of any committed
> > follower of his) should regard my efforts as 'misguided' and
> > 'offensive'.
>
> Unless you think everybody else on this list is literally a moron
you
> cannot seriously mean that the claims you make are "self-evident". &
unless you
> think we're all gross hypocrites, you can't attribute our uniform
rejection of
> your claims to lack of commitment to the gospel. If you do think that
we're
> morons & hypocrites, your time would be better spend trying to persuade
others.
> If you don't think that, you might consider a basic criterion for both
> scientific and theological study enunciated, I think, by Snoopy: "Have
you ever
> considered the possibility that you might be wrong?"
>
> Shalom,
>
> George
>
> George L. Murphy
> http://web.raex.com/~gmurphy/
> "The Science-Theology Dialogue"
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 22 2001 - 04:22:40 EDT