Not to mention the cherry picking of data, the careful quote mining,
the pretense that their is a scientific controversy and the scientific
vacuity involved. Although GW at least attempts to provide scientific
explanations of the data even though they fail miserably.
On Jan 2, 2008 1:08 PM, David Opderbeck <dopderbeck@gmail.com> wrote:
> The first and probably most significant common link between strong ID and
> global warming skepticism is politics. Both seem to fit into a far right /
> libertarian paradigm. The second common link is a populist distrust of the
> mainstream scientific establishment.
>
>
>
>
> On Jan 2, 2008 3:56 PM, j burg <hossradbourne@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > There seems to be some similarities betweeen these two very different
> science teaching issues.
> >
> > If one opposes teaching the "evidences" of ID in a science class, should
> he also oppose teaching the "evidences " against global warming?
> >
> > What differentiates the two?
> >
> > Burgy
>
>
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Fri Jan 4 13:23:17 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jan 04 2008 - 13:23:17 EST