Re: [asa] Does the flagellum prove Genesis?

Is that the best you can offer? I am amazed that with all the noise,
ID has nothing to offer in the area of evolution?

Surely you do understand the difference between regular and rarefied design?

On Dec 8, 2007 8:06 PM, John Walley <john_walley@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> What about the Mt. Rushmore and Easter Island arguments? Who denies that
> those were not the product of intelligent design? When you see a universe
> constructed just so, it is rational to conclude the same about it.
>
>
>
> John
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu [mailto:asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu] On
> Behalf Of Randy Isaac
> Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2007 10:30 PM
> To: asa@calvin.edu
> Subject: Re: [asa] Does the flagellum prove Genesis?
>
>
>
>
> I have encouraged my ID friends, who keep saying that ID is not a negative
> approach but a positive indicator of design, to really pursue that
> direction. I have urged them to identify a specific example that is not
> negative or anti-evolution but is nevertheless a positive indication of an
> intelligent design in their opinion. I'm still waiting. Perhaps you could
> help provide one?
>
>
>
>
>
> Randy
>
>
>
>
>
> P.S. Hint: I do have a list of candidates in mind.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
>
> From: John Walley
>
>
> To: 'Dehler, Bernie'
>
>
> Cc: asa@calvin.edu
>
>
> Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 4:18 PM
>
>
> Subject: RE: [asa] Does the flagellum prove Genesis?
>
>
>
>
> Thanks!!! This nails it for me. The problem with ID is that instead of
> being just pro-design, they went negative and anti-evolution.
>
>
>
> ...

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Sat Dec 8 23:35:48 2007