RE: [asa] Does the flagellum prove Genesis?

What about the Mt. Rushmore and Easter Island arguments? Who denies that
those were not the product of intelligent design? When you see a universe
constructed just so, it is rational to conclude the same about it.

John

-----Original Message-----
From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu [mailto:asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu] On
Behalf Of Randy Isaac
Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2007 10:30 PM
To: asa@calvin.edu
Subject: Re: [asa] Does the flagellum prove Genesis?

I have encouraged my ID friends, who keep saying that ID is not a negative
approach but a positive indicator of design, to really pursue that
direction. I have urged them to identify a specific example that is not
negative or anti-evolution but is nevertheless a positive indication of an
intelligent design in their opinion. I'm still waiting. Perhaps you could
help provide one?

Randy

P.S. Hint: I do have a list of candidates in mind.

----- Original Message -----

From: John Walley <mailto:john_walley@yahoo.com>

To: 'Dehler, <mailto:bernie.dehler@intel.com> Bernie'

Cc: asa@calvin.edu

Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 4:18 PM

Subject: RE: [asa] Does the flagellum prove Genesis?

Thanks!!! This nails it for me. The problem with ID is that instead of
being just pro-design, they went negative and anti-evolution.

...

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Sat Dec 8 23:06:48 2007