I agree, I apologize for too short a reply initially.
On 4/23/07, Bill Hamilton <williamehamiltonjr@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Pim wrote
>
> However to suggest that just because science may not fully understand
> the full details of the many processes involved, that such models have
> no predictive value seems 'nonsense' and allows one to reject the hard
> work of thousands of scientists who are using and validating these
> models.
>
> Of course I made no such suggestion -- that was Freeman Dyson. My point was
> quite the same as yours: to just say "the models are based on the
> Navier-Stokes equations" sweeps a great deal of hard work under the rug.
> Bill Hamilton
> William E. Hamilton, Jr., Ph.D.
> 248.652.4148 (home) 248.821.8156 (mobile)
> "...If God is for us, who is against us?" Rom 8:31
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
> Check out new cars at Yahoo! Autos.
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Tue Apr 24 01:26:37 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Apr 24 2007 - 01:26:39 EDT