Re: I AM RIGHT AND YOU ARE WRONG

At 03:58 AM 27/12/2003 -0600, bpayne15@juno.com wrote:
>On Sat, 27 Dec 2003 09:26:02 -0500 wallyshoes <wallyshoes@mindspring.com>
>writes:
>
>I don't see much other way to interpret this than to say that "wall"
>implies that the air/water contact was vertical on the right and left
>sides of the path of dry land. If you accept that interpretation, then
>YEC is an easy concept to believe.
>
>Bill

And I believe it fully. However, read my other posting as well. Language
is more difficult than what you say. But I do not see any contradiction
to that in still existing nature. In general I do keep quiet about
discussions like this in church, since explaining all these things about
translating in conversation, even here, is impossible. It helps being
multi-lingual, but it is not enough.

I accept everyone, who says Jesus Christ is my Saviour, even when they have
ideas which I cannot possibly believe, as long as they don't force me to
follow their beliefs. The subjects discussed cannot be discussed in a
conversation. Much more study is needed than is possible in a discussion
on the Internet, or even in your living room, except if both parties are
willing to meet together for a year or longer and discuss these things
thoroughly. But there is more scholarship involved than Theology or a
branch of "Scoence".

Jan de Koning
Received on Sat Dec 27 13:58:55 2003