Re: RATE

From: Jay Willingham (jaywillingham@cfl.rr.com)
Date: Wed Oct 08 2003 - 17:47:00 EDT

  • Next message: George Murphy: "Re: Not RATE (Was RE: Rate)"

    Jay Willingham wrote:

    >> > One could hypothesize that Pangea's division began in the time of Peleg
    of
    > > Genesis 10:25, "Two sons were born to Eber: One was named Peleg, [ 10:25
    > > [Peleg] means [ division ] . ] because in his time the earth was
    divided;
    > > his brother was named Joktan."
    >
    Stephen J. Krogh, P.G. <panterragroup@mindspring.com> wrote
    >
    > Why would "one" want to? I suppose you could also "postulate" that WWII
    > occurred before the Civil War, but that wouldn't make sense either. BTW,
    > please bottom post.

    Jay Willingham wrote:

    The history of the last 200 years is a bit easier to prove empirically than
    that of millenia ago.

    God had laid out what happened in the Bible and I tend to believe his
    testimony. That does not mean my interpretation of it is any better than
    anyone else's.

    It also does not mean I blindly believe anyone else's interpretation of
    scientific truth, either.

    I am looking for ways of reconciling scientific and Biblical truth.

    What makes sense to man does not necessarily make sense to God.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Oct 08 2003 - 17:45:52 EDT