From: Stephen J. Krogh, P.G. (panterragroup@mindspring.com)
Date: Wed Oct 08 2003 - 17:15:15 EDT
> -----Original Message-----
> From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu [mailto:asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu]On
> Behalf Of Jay Willingham
> Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 3:58 PM
> To: ASA
> Subject: Re: RATE
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Stephen J. Krogh, P.G." <panterragroup@mindspring.com>
> To: <asa@calvin.edu>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 4:16 PM
> Subject: RE: RATE
>
>
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu [mailto:asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu]On
> > > Behalf Of Jay Willingham
> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 2:53 PM
> > > To: ASA
> > > Subject: Re: RATE
> > >
> > >
> > > Say the flood occurred before Pangea was broken up in Peleg's
> > > time. And say
> > > there has been recent evidence of accelerated evolutionary
> > > processes in New
> > > World finches, why is this a difficulty?
> > >
> > > Are there no fossils of the New World opossum's progenitors?
> > >
> > > Jay Willingham
> > >
> > >
> >
> > What does Pangaea have to do with Peleg's time?
>
> One could hypothesize that Pangea's division began in the time of Peleg of
> Genesis 10:25, "Two sons were born to Eber: One was named Peleg, [ 10:25
> [Peleg] means [ division ] . ] because in his time the earth was divided;
> his brother was named Joktan."
Why would "one" want to? I suppose you could also "postulate" that WWII
occurred before the Civil War, but that wouldn't make sense either. BTW,
please bottom post.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Oct 08 2003 - 17:15:13 EDT