Re: Clarification -- Re: Dawkins dissembles?

From: Dawsonzhu@aol.com
Date: Fri Jul 18 2003 - 05:42:38 EDT

  • Next message: Dawsonzhu@aol.com: "Re: Clarification -- Re: Dawkins dissembles?"

    Walter Hicks wrote:

    >In the past, I have noted from the Humanist web
    >site the names of their prominent members. Quite
    >often they are the leaders in the organizations
    >cited. Such a high correlation implied to me that
    >they are using these media to expose their
    >atheistic viewpoints. (e.g. Sagan, Asimov, etc.)
    >It's just a suggestion -- I offer no proof.

    The fact that they are in these positions is not
    so much the question I think. The question is,
    "how did things end up this way".

    As a person who came to become a Christian in his
    adult life, one of the things that kept me out of
    the faith was that there were no prominant Christian
    role models in the people I looked up to. Not only that,
    the place where I heard most Christians speaking from
    were movements like the YEC. Such notions were embarassing
    to me and did not represent people I could identify with
    in any respect.

    There are some things that are worth taking a stand on:
    injustice, fraud, persistent denial of facts, ignoring
    the poor, defending the rights of those who cannot help
    themselves, protesting disagreeable things in a constructive
    way, etc. These are all things that Christians have
    and still do sometimes and I don't think anyone would feel
    bad about being classed in the above list. However, what are
    we (Christians) most noted for? YEC, intolernace, vituperative
    attacks on people we disagree with (even in our own faith),
    relentlessly ignoring facts but claiming that we are
    listening, and many other things that are quite embarassing
    when I think about it too much. It is not like atheists don't
    do this also, but we (as Christians) are demanded to obey a
    higher standard. In many case, we are not.

    Just like us, the atheists (that I am friends with) typically
    share a simlar passion for the things I list above. They are
    academics like myself. The main difference is that I know I
    cannot accomplish it on my own. Human beings in general are
    blind, prideful, ideological rather than thoughtful, lazy,
    uncharitable, greedy for fame, and filled with a self-deceit.
    If I want to get beyond those things and do any good, I have
    come to see that it takes God to make me a man who can keep
    to these goals.

    So I think it is really the people we look up to as we climb the
    ladder of education that most strongly influence a gradual
    trend toward atheism. Amos and Jeremiah are two OT books that
    I can identify with. I find it ironic that I heard more in
    the classroom from atheists about questioning injustice in
    the world than I ever did from the Christians.

    I don't know any NAS folk personally, but peer selection and
    gradual identity with the group probably have more to do with
    the qualitities that make good scientists. I think Christianity
    still belongs in that list, but we have been wasting time on
    pointless and useless matters that have nothing to do with
    why anyone would ever be grateful that they had chosen the way
    of Christ in the struggle toward becoming a good scientist.

    By Grace alone we proceed,
    Wayne



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jul 18 2003 - 05:43:13 EDT