Re: Clarification -- Re: Dawkins dissembles?

From: Dawsonzhu@aol.com
Date: Fri Jul 18 2003 - 05:59:32 EDT

  • Next message: RFaussette@aol.com: "Re: Clarification -- Re: Dawkins dissembles?"

    Wayne:
    >> Perhaps what Howard is saying here is that it would
    >> be useful to hear why 93% of the folk in NAS have
    >> little or no interest in religion and particularly
    >> Christianity. I have an unpleasent feeling that a
    >> large part of the reason might be because of
    >> Christians.

    Rich Faussette wrote:
    >Do you know who the leadership of the NAS is? If they are old covenanters,
    >they are just being religious...
    >
    >Be careful not to make a covenant with the natives of the land against which
    >you are going, or they will prove a snare in your midst.
    > No: you shall demolish their altars, smash their sacred
    >pillars and cut down their sacred poles. Exodus 34 (10-14)

    I do not say that they are right for becoming atheists, I am only
    saying that they may have become atheists because of what they
    saw in Christians. (See my comments to Walter Hicks in the previous
    post for some examples).

    >Did it ever occur to you that there are postmodern initiatives to separate
    >you from your religion? like Dawkins'?

    Dawkins is clearly an ideologue and as such should be viewed
    with suspicion not only by people who believe in God. As I said
    above, I don't necessarily agree with the views of people who
    reject Christianity. However, I have to admit that sometimes,
    in the reasons for their rejection, they have a point.

    >
    >Did you ever hear Dershowitz talk about the evils of Christianity?

    I'm sorry, I probably should know who this person is, but as
    usual, I am ignorant of far more things than I will ever
    be able to imagine and cannot answer this.

    By Grace alone we proceed,
    Wayne



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jul 18 2003 - 05:59:52 EDT