Mike writes
>other than your usual rude comments.
You know, Mike, I may be able to ignore almost all of your last post.
Because, as usual, you have not provided a whit of backup for your
"clear" (you really like to use that word, don't you?) pronouncements.
Do you want to know what I find "rude", Mike. Trying to win an
argument WITHOUT a fair-minded discussion.
I have provided specific backup for my chronological reasoning. I
have admitted an incomplete understanding of Ezekiel.
Where is your chronological dating, WITH BACKUP!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And, for the sake of the list, I apologize if the perception was
rudeness on my part.
Done with this so-called discussion. You can believe whatever you
want to about your 4,000 years. You can't back it up.
Jim
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jun 16 2002 - 06:19:16 EDT