verification of flood issues. RE: Creation Ex Nihilio and other journals

From: Glenn Morton (glenn.morton@btinternet.com)
Date: Mon Jan 22 2001 - 15:15:17 EST

  • Next message: Glenn Morton: "RE: Creation Ex Nihilio and other journals"

    >-----Original Message-----
    >From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu [mailto:asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu]On
    Behalf Of Dick Fischer
    >Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 1:10 AM
    >To: asa@calvin.edu
    >Subject: RE: Creation Ex Nihilio and other journals
    >
    >
    >Glenn wrote:
    >
    >
    > Early Genesis (the flood in particular) is about the only thing
    >that even has a prayer of actually being verifiable. If you can lay out a
    >means of verifying any other event which can be verified from this modern
    >point of view, then I will gladly listen.
    >
    >The tower of Babel is certainly verifiable as a description of a
    Mesopotamian
    >ziggurat. Try to find mud bricks lined with asphalt anywhere else in the
    world.
    >The timing is right, from around 3000 BC to 2000 BC, the place is right,
    Babylon,
    >and the description is right on. I don't know how the writer of Genesis
    >could have been any more obvious. Yet, do you listen?

    You are correct that the T of B is verifiable. The ziggurats you speak of
    are not, however, verification of any direct intervention by God into this
    world which is what I am really at heart looking for. God interacted at
    Babel to alter language. But there is no evidence of that between 3000-2000
    years BC. The origin of language families is long before 3000-2000 BC.

    One parting shot, since you took one at me about listening--Yeah, I listen
    more than you. You still have that silly idea that water in the mesopotamian
    flood can flow up hill carrying the ark from sealevel up to 3000+ feet in
    elevation or that the ark can be poled, with all those animals and weight,
    by only 8 people against the natural downhill flow of water (3+ mph) which
    would exert such a force on the boat that you hypothesis would fail. I would
    like to see you do an experiment with 8 people to see if this is possible. I
    have yet to see you provide any calculations of the energy requirements of
    such a feat of poling the ark uphill at least 3000 feet in elevation against
    a flow of water which wouuld have been strong enough to wash everything
    away!

    Have you ever listened on this point? If so, I don't recall you ever saying
    anything about it. On this issue, you ignore natural law every bit as much
    as the YECs do on everything else.

    glenn

    see http://www.glenn.morton.btinternet.co.uk/dmd.htm
    for lots of creation/evolution information
    anthropology/geology/paleontology/theology\
    personal stories of struggle



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 22 2001 - 15:12:50 EST