From: Dick Fischer
To: asa@calvin.edu
"But sounding a cautionary note, Collins also predicted that the huge reliance
on genetic technology in healthcare will re-activate 'the major anti-technology
movements and anti-technology fervor' that currently dog public acceptance of
genetic advances."
And isn't this "anti-technology movement" kin to the anti-science movement
championed by CRS, ICR, and the likes of Phil Johnson, et al.
You are very close to liable and slander. I recommend an apology. None of those groups are "anti-technology" nor "Anti-science." They are most definitely "anti-evolutionism." Such a position is the antithesis of "anti-science."
Creationists will indeed welcome such news that supposed "junk genes" actually have a purpose after all. This is what they have been saying all along. Looks like they have been more scientific that evolutionists.
Allen
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 21 2001 - 01:10:58 EST