In a message dated 10/6/00 4:17:31 AM Dateline Standard Time,
rwein@lineone.net writes:
<< OOL researchers are *not* claiming to have scientific evidence of OOL.
Dembski *is* claiming to have scientific evidence of ID. Important
difference. >>
Yet most scientists embrace OOL claims, even to the point of teaching it
in text books.
Another point to make in support of DNAunion's point is that it took about 60
years to turn Darwin's thesis into a robust science (the Modern Synthesis).
Darwin and his followers were not obliged to concede to their critics and
abandon their ideas during these 60 years. Expecting Dembski to do in one
year what their community did in 60 years is unreasonable.
Mike
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Oct 06 2000 - 23:10:38 EDT