>>>Susan: GOOD GOLLY MISS MOLLY! DNAunion has sent more than 18 posts on this
subject! I know because I counted them as I deleted them (I scanned the
first couple). Posting a note to the list is enough. You don't have to send
duplicate posts to individuals.
DNAunion: GOOD GOLLY MISS MOLLY - Susan is showing her prejudice once again!
Are you not smart enough to figure out that I received 18 replies myself?
But of course "you people" tying up this site with your responses to me is
inconsequential - it is only I, the newcomer and outsider, that is doing
something wrong.
Perhaps "you people" should get together and formulate a single response to
my post, then I would need to respond only once.
>Susan: I asked Huxter for his evidence and he provided it. It *is* very
compelling.
DNAunion: Gee, I must have missed Huxter's "compelling" evidence that I was
a creationist, could you provide it to us? In fact, I even challenged him to
provide a single valid piece of evidence showing that I am a creationist - no
response from the Huxter. Why don't YOU Susan supply us with a single valid
piece of evidence that I am a creationist.
Gee, I must have missed Huxter's "compelling" evidence that I was nucacids
here, could you provide it to us? Or could YOU Susan provide us with a
single valid piece of evidence that I am Nucacids?
Gee, I must have missed Huxter's "compelling" evidence that I posted under
multiple names at ARN, could you provide it to us? Or could YOU Susan
provide us with a single valid piece of evidence that I posted under multiple
names at ARN?
Gee, I must have missed Huxter's "compelling" evidence that I am dishonest,
could you provide it to us? Or could YOU Susan provide with valid evidence
that I am dishonest?
Gee, I must have missed Huxter's "compelling" evidence that ARN was closed
down because people were posting under multiple names, could you provide it
to us? Or could YOU Susan provide us with valid evidence that shows the ARN
discussion forum was suspended because people were in fact posting under
multiple names?
Gee, you must have missed my compelling evidence that my posting under two
names - at different times - at the MetaCrock site is not against that
board's rules: no foul committed and no need for Huxter to exclaim "alert"
and "be wary" of me.
But of course, as you state Susan, Huxter's evidences were just so darned
"compelling" (sarcasm intended).
>Susan: So bluster all you want. What I said (in jest, actually) stands.
DNAunion: So you are going to obstinate. I see. You call me, Mike Gene,
and/or others at ARN *DISHONEST CREATIONISTS* without having a shred of
evidence then, and though you still lack compelling evidence even now, you
will stick to your original uninformed, unsupported, insults. Your complete
prejudice for "us people" is duly noted.
>>Susan: Creationism = "God created everything in the form we see it in
today.
>>Nothing evolved over time."
>>
>>ID = "God (or *wink* *wink* someone else) created bacteria flagellum in the
> form we see it in today. It didn't evolve over time."
>DNAunion: So you admit your ignorance of ID openly - that's refreshing!
>
>ID is not tied to God, as you claim in your self-concocted definition.
>Susan: The Discovery Institute and all of the major ID proponents disagree
with
you--as do I.
DNAunion: Simple question: if aliens designed life and seeded it on Earth,
would this or would this not be intelligent design? Of course it would.
>DNAunion: Evolutionist: believes that retaining the most fit and
eliminating the least fit will improve a species
>
>Nazi: believes that retaining the most fit and eliminating the least fit
will
>improve the species
> Susan: You might find this site very entertaining--I certainly did....
DNAunion: Great! So you admit that you know it is wrong to make claims for
others that they do not hold, yet that is exactly what you did. Here, let me
remind you.
>>Susan: Creationism = "God created everything in the form we see it in
today.
>>Nothing evolved over time."
>>
>>ID = "God (or *wink* *wink* someone else) created bacteria flagellum in the
> form we see it in today. It didn't evolve over time."
You picked a single example of a structure that Behe says did not arise by
evolution - neglecting everything that Behe and other IDists do accept were
created by evolution - and based on this highly-selective choice, your claim
that all ID proponents are Creationists. It is not my position, as an IDist,
that God (or God, wink wink) created the bacterial flagellum. This is a
straw man argument by you - you are just unable to see it when YOU do it, but
it jumps right out at you when other do (as I intentionally did in order to
demonstrate your error).
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 04 2000 - 13:48:21 EDT