Re: Numerical Significance

From: Vernon Jenkins (vernon.jenkins@virgin.net)
Date: Sun Oct 01 2000 - 18:37:46 EDT

  • Next message: Wesley R. Elsberry: "Dembski and calls for examples"

    Reflectorites:
     
    Before addressing the comments of my detractors* re my claim that from
    the numerics underlying the Bible's opening words, we may infer a
    supernatural origin - and much more beside! - I thought it appropriate
    to suggest a scenario that might elucidate the situation, as we find it:
     
    For the sake of argument let us assume that - concerning his being,
    omnipotence, omniscience and omnipresence - the Bible provides us with
    an introductory and correct assessment of our Creator. Then, bearing in
    mind the present state of the world (including the widespread unbelief,
    and much confusion as to what the Bible actually says), we might
    reasonably conclude that he would take extraordinary measures to protect
    the Bible - his word to man.

    We observe that every Hebrew and Greek word of the original documents
    which were to form the basis of all our Bible translations is also
    fairly, and naturally, interpretable as a number - this, by virtue of
    the fact that these peoples adopted schemes of alphabetic numeration
    during the closing centuries BC. Clearly, the same cannot be claimed for
    the majority of other texts; so a problem arises. How can some arbitrary
    scheme for converting words to numbers command general respect?!

    The biblical author - when he transmitted his words to Moses (c 1500 BC)
    - having at his command a preview of the such developments, might easily
    (for we have assumed his omnipotence) have built further information
    into these words - for the 'numeric channel' would be there, ready and
    waiting, many centuries down the line! But, what of the content of this
    'supporting' package? Clearly, to carry any weight with a largely
    unbelieving but very knowledgeable intelligentsia, the need would be
    either, (a) to pepper the whole book with arresting features (after the
    ELS manner) and/or, (b) to focus essentially on the opening words, and
    clothe them with a unique numerical structure. But, you will ask, of
    what might 'a unique numerical structure' consist?

    The combination of number and form is, potentially, very powerful in
    that it is comparatively rare, completely independent of time and place,
    and immune to tampering.. Furthermore, such a structure is capable of
    being widely understood - for virtually all are able to count and
    recognise association by visual symmetry. In my paper "The Lamp" -
    available online at

          http://homepage.virgin.net/vernon.jenkins/Symb.htm

      - I draw attention to the self-evidently unique properties of 37 and
    91 - the difference and sum, respectively, of the cubes of 4 and 3 (ie
    64 and 27). The first of these and its digit reverse (ie 73) are,
    respectively, 12th and 21st primes; the matching reflection in their
    order numbers is unique among the 13 million prime pairs examined; the
    product 37x73 is 2701 - 73rd triangle, and the sum of the 7 words of
    Gn.1:1; this triangle has an outline of 216, or 6x6x6 - a unique cube
    (superficial area is numerically the same, ie 6x6x6 units); 37 and 73
    are closely related geometrically (as the material at the foregoing URL
    demonstrates). The triangle representing the sum of the first 8 words
    is the 77th (ie 3003); this has 91 as a factor.

    A cursory examination of the biblical text reveals that the cube is a
    symbol of holiness (see 1Kings 6:20 and Rev.21:16). The presence of the
    foregoing cubes is therefore apposite to this context, as are the
    equilateral triangles - symbols of the coequal Trinity: Father, Son and
    Holy Spirit.

    The choice of numerical material here in the Bible's opening words -
    together with such connotations - is, I submit, sufficiently remarkable
    to draw the earnest seeker of truth to consider the many other attendant
    details more closely. (These are available online at the URLs given
    below.)

    In conclusion, I suggest the foregoing scenario is close to the truth of
    the matter. However, I would be interested to hear the views of others
    who - having examined the details I have provided - are able to offer a
    more reasonable explanation of the Gn.1:1 phenomena. Clearly, the claim
    I am making invites a solid rebuttal from those with atheistic leanings!

    In anticipation,
     
    Vernon
     
    Vernon Jenkins MSc
    [musician, mining engineer, and formerly Senior Lecturer in Maths and
    Computing, the Polytechnic of Wales (now the University of Glamorgan)]
    http://homepage.virgin.net/vernon.jenkins/index.htm
    http://www.compulink.co.uk/~indexer/miracla1.htm

    * in a further posting



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Oct 01 2000 - 18:38:43 EDT