<http://www.usnewswire.com/topnews/Current_Releases/0508-102.html>
It describes how "top scientists" from the Discovery Institute are
going to brief legislators on "design theory". Among those listed
as "top scientists" is William Dembski, whose views on politics
were posted on Meta-Views as:
"The whole politicization of ID research associated with the "Wedge"
is something from which we want to distance ourselves."
It looks more like Dembski is "going the distance" for the
Wedge than "distancing" himself from it.
Another odd bit is how Dembski is described as an "Associate
Research Professor" at Baylor, yet various statements from the
Baylor adminstration had said that Dembski and Gordon were not
considered Baylor faculty. How does that work out to a
consistent stance?
Wesley
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 09 2000 - 12:04:25 EDT