Re: Gene duplication and design

From: billwald@juno.com
Date: Thu Apr 27 2000 - 22:26:07 EDT

  • Next message: Cliff Lundberg: "Re: Scientists Say Universe Is Flat But Growing"

    > Whether suffering and joy
    >are nothing more than mechanical stimulation of a set of nerves can
    neither
    >be proved nor disproved scientifically.

    Experiments where test animals brains are hard wired to stimulate the
    pleasure center and the animal starves while pushing the happy button?

    > The existence of free will can
    >neither be proved nor disproved scientifically.

    AMEN!

    > I haven't seen evidence of "creationists" proposing
    >specific "interventions in the laws of nature" as scientific fact.

    Not exactly. They do it by redefining words to suit their purpose. They
    mush together science, metaphysics, and history. Science deals with
    repeatable data and relationships, not facts. "First cause" is a
    metaphysical problem, not a scientific problem.

    (For example) If Noah's flood had occurred after the invention of movable
    type then the flood might be a proper topic for scientific investigation.
    It is hard to say where historical data mushes into creation myth, but
    Noah's flood is definately over the line and is creation myth, but
    "Creation Scientists" consider the Genesis story as hard data. And
    neither do they understand that "myth" is not a judgement of truth value.

    billwald@juno.com

    ________________________________________________________________
    YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
    Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
    Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
    http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Apr 27 2000 - 23:23:17 EDT