Re: Dennett's bad word and Johnson's question

From: Tedd Hadley (hadley@reliant.yxi.com)
Date: Tue Mar 28 2000 - 12:16:25 EST

  • Next message: MikeBGene@aol.com: "Re: Dennett's bad word and Johnson's question"

    MikeBGene@aol.com writes
      in message <d6.2069670.26121750@aol.com>:
     <snip>
    >
    > I am not asking for direct evidence as I do not expect such a
    > thing. Indirect evidence is just fine. What indirect evidence
    > indicates that a major evolutionary innovation was indeed the
    > product of RM&NS?

       How about evidence of gene duplication? Unless the process of
       gene duplication can be shown to require intelligent help, I
       think RM & NS wins again.

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Mar 28 2000 - 12:16:20 EST