Why assume a lie?
Bertvan@aol.com
Sun, 28 Nov 1999 09:41:05 ESTHUXTER:
>And yet it is totally irrlevent to evolution. You may dislike the
materialist >philosophy. So what. Your (and Johnson's, etc.) does not make
it non-viable. >Nor does it have any bearing on whether or not evolution is
true. I fin that when >one tries to turn this into a philosophical debate,
it is because they have no >evidence on their side. Your refusal to address
the points of my previous post, >and instead your focusing on the
'philosophical' point bears witness to that.
Hi Huxter,
A materialist philosophy is as viable as a philosophy which includes purpose,
plan and design. Anyone should be free to choose. If Darwinism is defined
as excluding plan, purpose or design, anyone should be free to be skeptical.
Bertvan