Re: Four items of possible controversy

From: RFaussette@aol.com
Date: Wed Nov 12 2003 - 11:41:20 EST

  • Next message: John W Burgeson: "Re: Four items of possible controversy"

    In a message dated 11/12/03 11:06:02 AM Eastern Standard Time,
    jwburgeson@juno.com writes:
    Admanson's advocacy of a "Christian State" (is the word theonomy?) is one
    I regard with absolute horror, but I also must assume he holds that
    peculiar position honestly and sincerely. Such a position, of course,
    leads him to naturally oppose the bishop's consecration. But is Admanson
    an Episcopal? If not -- is is ethical for him to fund one side in a fight
    he has no stake in? And to what extent should he make his funding public?
    The Noahide Laws were passed into law in the US in 1991. You must be
    absolutely horrified!

    A religious bloc vote by a religious community propelled Hilary Clinton to
    the Senate when New Square NY voted 1400 to 12 after Hilary's visit to the
    rabbi.

    The word is theocracy.

    To suggest that Christians not use wealth to protect their "altars" is
    naive.

    rich faussette



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 12 2003 - 11:41:51 EST