From: Dick Fischer (dickfischer@earthlink.net)
Date: Sun Nov 02 2003 - 12:08:01 EST
Mike DePangher wrote:
>Dear Vernon,
>You have cited Mat 24:38-39 as evidence of the universality of Noah's
>flood. I quote the passage here in fuller context for everyone's ease of
>reference:
>
>NAU Matthew 24:37-42 37 "For the coming of the Son of Man will be just
>like the days of Noah. 38 "For as in those days before the flood they were
>eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that
>Noah entered the ark, 39 and they did not understand until the flood came
>and took them all away; so will the coming of the Son of Man be. 40 "Then
>there will be two men in the field; one will be taken and one will be
>left. 41 "Two women will be grinding at the mill; one will be taken and
>one will be left. 42 "Therefore be on the alert, for you do not know which
>day your Lord is coming.
>
>The extended passage clearly argues primarily for the element of surprise
>in both the flood and the coming of the Son of Man. However, since vs 37
>specifically says that "the coming of the Son of Man will be just like the
>days of Noah" and vss 40-41 say that at the coming of the Son of Man 50%
>of all people will be "taken" and 50% will be left behind, we would have
>to conclude that Matthew is claiming that 50% of the people were killed in
>Noah's flood and 50% survived. Am I missing something?
You (and Vernon) have missed the "Nephilim" in pre-flood Genesis 6:4 who
are also mentioned in post-flood Numbers 13:33. If they are on both sides
of the flood according to the OT, who else might have survived? So if you
take it literally, the flood was NOT universal.
Dick Fischer - Genesis Proclaimed Association
Finding Harmony in Bible, Science, and History
www.genesisproclaimed.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Nov 02 2003 - 12:11:23 EST