Re: Sin?

From: George Murphy (gmurphy@raex.com)
Date: Thu Aug 07 2003 - 13:36:04 EDT

  • Next message: RFaussette@aol.com: "Re: Sin?"

    I agree with others on the list who think that we've pretty well mined out the
    relevance of science-theology issues for questions about homosexuality, at least for the
    time being. The science-theology interaction is certainly relevant there but it seems
    to me that what can be said pretty much has been said - often more than once.
             This certainly doesn't mean that I think the subject is no longer worth
    speaking about: I just finished a 5 page essay for preachers for this coming Sunday,
    tied to lectionary texts & the issues raised at the Episcopal convention, for an
    internet sermon resource. But it gives a distorted picture of what the asa list is
    supposed to be to continue threads which often have nothing to do with science. I will
    be replying privately to Burgy's most recent post.

                                                            Shalom,
                                                            George

    George L. Murphy
    gmurphy@raex.com
    http://web.raex.com/~gmurphy/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Aug 07 2003 - 13:34:51 EDT