From: brian harper (harper.10@osu.edu)
Date: Tue Aug 05 2003 - 12:15:38 EDT
At 05:36 PM 8/4/2003 -0700, richard@biblewheel.com wrote:
>In post http://www.calvin.edu/archive/asa/200307/0650.html Glen responded to
>my question
>
> >Also, my point was that if we do live in an
> >ID universe, which you admit to be possible,
> >then it would seem that ID science would be
> >*necessary* to correctly understand our
> >universe. Is this correct?
This doesn't seem correct to me for several
reasons. First, it would depend on the nature
and purpose of the designer. Second we can
look at past experience. IDers claim fine-tuning
as an example of ID. What role did ID science
play in the identification of fine-tuning?
Brian Harper
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Aug 05 2003 - 09:11:36 EDT