>>Sure _ & you can also argue that there were originally two blind men
instead of one in Mk.10:46-52 so that it agrees with Mt.20:29-34. Anything
can be harmonized with anything in this way, at the cost of rewriting the
Bible.
>>
I don't think I implied I thought that was a good answer to the statement
you made. It is surely "ad hoc." None the less my KJV only friends see
explanations such as this as a "defense" of scriptural inerrancy. You should
see how they reconcile the numeric discrepancies I cited a few weeks ago.
Burgy
(Ipsius sunt tempora)
www.burgy.50megs.com
_________________________________________________________________
Join the worldís largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 29 2002 - 21:18:19 EDT