Glenn Morton wrote:
>Dick Fischer wrote:
>>Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 8:21 AM
>>I agree! All the Bible is about real human beings. Nothing about
>>hominids, Australopiticines, Homo erectus, or any of that bunch.
>>Speculation about what constitutes a human being beyond sheer
>>anatomy, is just that - speculation. Speculation about what God did
>>with them is still speculation.
>
>But apparently you seem to have gathered the idea that Native Americans were
>nothing more than dog- and cat-like creatures until the time of Christ. And
>my great...great grandpappy was equally a dog- or cat-like non-real human
>being. Do you really expect that concept to sell?
Glenn, you had suggested that those living before Adam would be
dispatched to hell. I replied that not even cats or dogs go to hell.
I did not say your ancestors were like cats and dogs. To be
specific, unaccountable human beings, such as your great ... great
granddad, would neither be rewarded for righteousness or condemned
for unrighteousness.
>In your discourse, it seems to me that there is room for God to insert a
>soul in a cat or dog.
To what purpose?
>Are any animals possessed of this soul?
I have no clue.
> What evidence would make them show that they have a soul?
See my previous answer.
> What activity do they lack which tells you they absolutely don't have a soul?
I don't even understand this question.
Dick Fischer - The Origins Solution - www.orislol.com
ěThe Answer we should have known about 150 years agoî
--=====================_22895029==_.ALT
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
<html>
Glenn Morton wrote:<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite>Dick Fischer wrote:<br>
>Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 8:21 AM<br>
>I agree! All the Bible is about real human beings.
Nothing about<br>
>hominids, Australopiticines, Homo erectus, or any of that
bunch.<br>
>Speculation about what constitutes a human being beyond sheer<br>
>anatomy, is just that - speculation. Speculation about what God
did<br>
>with them is still speculation.<br><br>
But apparently you seem to have gathered the idea that Native Americans
were<br>
nothing more than dog- and cat-like creatures until the time of
Christ. And<br>
my great...great grandpappy was equally a dog- or cat-like non-real
human<br>
being. Do you really expect that concept to
sell?</blockquote><br>
Glenn, you had suggested that those living before Adam would be
dispatched to hell. I replied that not even cats or dogs go to
hell. I did not say your ancestors were like cats and dogs.
To be specific, unaccountable human beings, such as your great ... great
granddad, would neither be rewarded for righteousness or condemned for
unrighteousness.<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite>In your discourse, it seems to me
that there is room for God to insert a<br>
soul in a cat or dog.</blockquote><br>
To what purpose?<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite>Are any animals possessed of this
soul?</blockquote><br>
I have no clue.<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite> What evidence would make them
show that they have a soul?</blockquote><br>
See my previous answer.<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite> What activity do they lack
which tells you they absolutely don't have a soul?</blockquote><br>
I don't even understand this question.<br><br>
Dick Fischer - <i>The Origins Solution</i> -
<a href="http://www.orislol.com/" eudora="autourl"><font
color="#0000FF"><u>www.orislol.com<br>
</a></u></font>ěThe Answer we should have known about 150 years
agoî<br><br>
<br>
</html>
--=====================_22895029==_.ALT--
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jul 19 2002 - 00:23:09 EDT