How about a single, intelligent mind living in Maccabean times:)
More seriously, Allen, your defense of Daniel, while earnest, detailed and
intelligent, seems strained to me. I frankly doubt that if Daniel were a non
canonical book, that you would resort to these gyrations to defend its
historical accuracy. That is the test: If Daniel was simply another ancient
book, would you resort to these types of defenses? Would you credit these
defenses if someone else advanced them? I think not.
-----Original Message-----
From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu [mailto:asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu]On
Behalf Of Allen Roy
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 3:11 AM
To: asa@calvin.edu
Subject: Understanding prophecy, Part 2
As part of the issue of whether Daniel was written by one person or
several, some interesting points about the literary structure of Daniel
may provide some evidence.
As I am certain most everyone on this list knows, Hebrew poetry is
composed of chaism of various sorts. Rather than meter and rhyme,
Hebrew poetry consists of an assortment of thoughts arranged or
juxtaposed with each other in various ways. It is curious that the
elements that make up the book of Daniel have been arranged in a double
chaism.
The following chart illustrates this chaism arrangement. Here are some
interesting points.
1. The first chaism is written entirely in Aramaic, the second chaism is
written in Hebrew.
2. The first level (A) consists of prophetic sections that deal with
the general population of the world. Level B deals with God's people.
Level C has to do with human kings. And level D has to do with God's
King -- the Messiah.
3. The imagery of the first and last prophetic sections of level A
deals with kings -- a metal statue of King Nebuchadnezzer in Daniel 2
and the kings of the North and South of Daniel 11-12.
4. The imagery of the two middle prophecies (ch. 7 and 8) consists of
an assortment of beasts.
5. The focus of the book is on the prophecy of Level D -- the 70 week
prophecy concerning the messiah.
Daniel 1
Historical Prologue Hebrew
A. Daniel 2
Kingdom prophecies:
Image of a King Aramaic
B. Daniel 3
Troubles of God's people:
Worship image/fiery furnace.
C. Daniel 4
King's prophecy: Nebuchadnezzar
Tree cut down.
C'. Daniel 5.
King's prophecy: Belashazzar
The writing on the wall.
B'. Daniel 6
Troubles of God's people:
Worship king/lion's den.
A'. Daniel 7
Kingdom prophecies:
Beasts
A''. Daniel 8
Kingdom prophecies:
Beasts
B''. Daniel 9A
Troubles of God's people:
Prayer for forgiveness
C''. Daniel 9:25
Kings prophecy:
Decree to construct Jerusalem
D. Daniel 9:26
Messiah dies alone
C'''. Daniel 9:27
Kings prophecy:
Decree to destroy Jerusalem
B'''. Daniel 10
Troubles of God's people:
Mourning for Temple.
A'''. Daniel 11 - 12A
Kingdom prophecies:
Kings of North and South
Daniel 12B
Prophetic Epilogue
The next chart is a more detailed look at the chaism for level C and D
concerning Jerusalem and the Messiah of the 70 week prophecy. It helps
clear up who is who in this somewhat complex prophecy.
A. Daniel 9:25A
Jerusalem construction:
Know and understand this: From the issuing of the decree to
restore and rebuild Jerusalem
B. Daniel 9:25B
Messiah:
until the Anointed One, the ruler, comes, there will be seven
'sevens' and sixty-two 'sevens.'
C. Daniel 9:25C
Jerusalem construction:
It will be rebuilt with streets and a trench, but in times of
trouble.
D. Daniel 9:26A
Messiah:
After the sixty-two 'sevens,' the Anointed One will be cut off,
but not for himself. [margin].
C'. Daniel 9:26B
Jerusalem destruction:
The people of the ruler who will come will destroy the city and
the sanctuary. The end will come like a flood: War will continue until
the end, and desolations have been decreed.
B'. Daniel 9:27A
Messiah:
He will confirm a covenant with many for one 'seven,' but in the
middle of that 'seven' he will put an end to sacrifice and offering.
A'. Daniel 9:27B
Jerusalem destruction:
And one who causes desolation will come on the wings of
abominations [margin] until the end that is decreed is poured out on
him.
All this is of importance to the topic of authorship because can such
symmetry and complexity be expected from an assortment of unknown,
gullible redactors or is it a product of a single, intelligent mind?
Allen
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jul 10 2002 - 17:13:40 EDT