>-----Original Message-----
>From: Shuan Rose [mailto:shuanr@boo.net]
>Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 11:04 AM
>To: Glenn Morton
>Cc: Asa
>Subject: RE: sciDocument.rtf
>
>
>
> Well, then, why the disagreement? Whether you want to call it
>accommodation to pre-scientific views or use of common idioms, clearly we
>have a scientifically inaccurate description of certain animals. WE should
>admit this to be so, rather than try to harmonize these statements with
>modern science. I'd still like some comments on the rest of my post , which
>involve more substantive issues.
I don't think I ever did try to harmonize these descriptions. What makes
you think I did? All I said was that language uses idioms and occasionally
words to describe things in ways which aren't accurate and at the same time
thought Gordon's view was a useful one.
>
glenn
see http://www.glenn.morton.btinternet.co.uk/dmd.htm
for lots of creation/evolution information
anthropology/geology/paleontology/theology\
personal stories of struggle
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jul 05 2002 - 17:19:28 EDT