Re: Framework interpretation

From: Terry M. Gray (grayt@lamar.colostate.edu)
Date: Sun Apr 28 2002 - 15:41:21 EDT

  • Next message: Steve Bishop: "Re: Framework interpretation"

    Steve,

    Here is the specific paragraph from Kline's 1996 paper:

    >Exod. 20:11 brings out explicitly that the continuing earthly
    >pattern of sabbatical weeks is a human copy of a divine original.
    >Within the two-register cosmology of the creation account with all
    >its replications of upper register realities in the lower register
    >world, all of them reproductions with a difference, there can be no
    >doubt about the figurative nature of the relationship of the Sabbath
    >ordinance to God's upper register creation week. The gratuitous
    >insistence of literalists that the terms of the Sabbath ordinance in
    >Exod. 20:11 demand that the creation week be one of literal solar
    >days is contradicted by the metaphorical character of the whole
    >series of creational replications to which the original Sabbath
    >ordinance (Gen. 2:3) belongs. Like man's nature as image of God,
    >man's walk in imitation of God's sabbatical way is not a matter of
    >one-to-one equivalence but of analogy, of similarity with a
    >difference. Like all the other lower register replicas, the
    >sabbatical week of the ordinance is a likeness of its original, not
    >exactly the same; it is an earthly metaphor for the heavenly
    >archetype.

    TG

    -- 
    _________________
    Terry M. Gray, Ph.D., Computer Support Scientist
    Chemistry Department, Colorado State University
    Fort Collins, Colorado  80523
    grayt@lamar.colostate.edu  http://www.chm.colostate.edu/~grayt/
    phone: 970-491-7003 fax: 970-491-1801
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 28 2002 - 15:43:36 EDT