Re: Christian Science?

From: Stuart d Kirkley (stucandu@lycos.com)
Date: Fri Apr 26 2002 - 16:19:50 EDT

  • Next message: MikeSatterlee@cs.com: "Re: Adam vs. 'adam / one cult's solution?"

    Once again, my apologies if this is a duplicate post, server problems
    seem to be wreaking some havoc with posts getting posted.

    Thanks so much for your post. It is unfortunate that people let
    ignorance and bias blind their objectivity and exploration of matters
    that really do merit a better understanding. Your approach to
    understanding the Christian Science religion and its adherents is
    heartening to me, as I'm sure it was to the fellow you mentioned in
    your post. Your message clearly shows that you have as good an
    understanding of the spirit of Christs charity as any religion
    teaches, and for that I am truly grateful. Thanks again, and God
    bless.
    Stuart Kirkley

    --
    

    On Thu, 25 Apr 2002 22:53:59 Walter Hicks wrote: >Hello, > >I am not really sure who said what and to whom, but I would like to put >in a few cents about Christian Scientists (which I am not). > >Back in my "college" days I knew a very bright person who was a >Christian Scientist and everybody thought that it was a "loony" >religious belief system and that he must be "loony" also. However, I >knew that he was very intelligent & I felt that it deserved more than >that simple dismissal. > >I talked to the student who held those beliefs. At first he was very >defensive, but finally he realized that I was sincere. > >I thoroughly read Mary baker Eddy's book -- not once but twice! After >reflecting upon it, I did not accept the belief system but I could well >understand how much overlap there was between what she said, what Jesus >said and much of "conventional" Christian belief. > >I think that much of what has been exchanged on this list is not at all >proper from one Christian to another. The only real issue (to me) is >whether or not a given individual is committed to following Jesus as >his/her Lord and Saviour. Such discussions can take place "OFFLINE". > >Even that may be a bit to "crafted" to satisfy some people. But it is >my "bottom line" and other issues are quite secondary. > >IMHO > > >Walt > >-- >=================================== >Walt Hicks <wallyshoes@mindspring.com> > >In any consistent theory, there must >exist true but not provable statements. >(Godel's Theorem) > >You can only find the truth with logic >If you have already found the truth >without it. (G.K. Chesterton) >=================================== >

    See Dave Matthews Band live or win a signed guitar http://r.lycos.com/r/bmgfly_mail_dmb/http://win.ipromotions.com/lycos_020201/splash.asp



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 26 2002 - 16:46:42 EDT