Re: Epicurean philosophy

From: John W Burgeson (burgytwo@juno.com)
Date: Thu Apr 25 2002 - 17:36:01 EDT

Next message: Dr. Blake Nelson: "Re: Bear sacrifice"

Previous message: Dr. Blake Nelson: "Re: Adam and Eve"
Maybe in reply to: John W Burgeson: "Epicurean philosophy"
Next in thread: Mccarrick Alan D CRPH: "Re: Epicurean philosophy"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>>I also have to say that this seems a long stretch to methodological
naturalism.>>

Possibly so. The notes I have posted came from a discussion of
methodological naturalism (Strunk called it atheistic naturalism I
believe) in Strunk's book ATHEISM.

To me it seems to be a logical match to the philosophy of science I was
taught at Carnegie Tech back in the dark ages (1949-53).

John Burgeson (Burgy)

http://www.burgy.50megs.com
(science/theology, quantum mechanics, baseball, ethics,
humor, cars, philosophy and much more)

Next message: Dr. Blake Nelson: "Re: Bear sacrifice"
Previous message: Dr. Blake Nelson: "Re: Adam and Eve"
Maybe in reply to: John W Burgeson: "Epicurean philosophy"
Next in thread: Mccarrick Alan D CRPH: "Re: Epicurean philosophy"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Apr 25 2002 - 18:08:40 EDT