I have already made my offline suggestion to Terry, but I would second this
alternative. I would add that the offender should be given a private
warning, a public warning, then "Plonk".
-----Original Message-----
From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu [mailto:asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu]On
Behalf Of Ted Davis
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 8:06 AM
To: Asa@calvin.edu
Subject: moderated list?
I've already made my suggestion to Terry, but I'll restate it here. I
recommend that, in lieu of a fully moderated listserve (which will be a lot
of work for someone and reduce the *good* kind of spontaneous exchanges),
that we have a "death penalty." In this scenario there is a moderator, but
her/his role in this case is simply to "kill" a subscriber who is repeatedly
out of line. The moderator makes that call, in response to complaints sent
privately to the moderator by subscribers. I don't think this would happen
often, but it certainly would have happened already a few times. For
example, we wouldn't have had to put up with the "scientific proof of God"
for more than a couple of days, and name calling can be halted abruptly.
Ted Davis
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 24 2002 - 09:03:38 EDT