Seely v Ruest&Fischer

From: Jim Eisele (jeisele@starpower.net)
Date: Sun Apr 21 2002 - 11:02:12 EDT

Next message: Shuan Rose: "RE: A matter of trust?(Or why YEC persists)"

Previous message: MikeSatterlee@cs.com: "Fish/Tetrapod transition/Seventy Weeks"
Next in thread: PHSEELY@aol.com: "Re: Seely v Ruest&Fischer"
Reply: PHSEELY@aol.com: "Re: Seely v Ruest&Fischer"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Paul, I looked once again at "The First Four Days of Genesis
in Concordist Theory and in Biblical Context"

A while back a discussion between you and Peter started, then
aborted. I don't see where your article addresses Ruest or
Dick. Um, you're outdated. What are your current objections
to concordism? Are they in print anywhere?

Jim

Next message: Shuan Rose: "RE: A matter of trust?(Or why YEC persists)"
Previous message: MikeSatterlee@cs.com: "Fish/Tetrapod transition/Seventy Weeks"
Next in thread: PHSEELY@aol.com: "Re: Seely v Ruest&Fischer"
Reply: PHSEELY@aol.com: "Re: Seely v Ruest&Fischer"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 21 2002 - 15:01:53 EDT