Blake Nelson wrote:
"Barring any glaring knock down data that go against your position
(which as a lawyer you are ethically required to
provide to a court in say a legal brief -- although
you may try to explain it away), you will choose those
data that make your case more compelling."
Lucy responds:
I don't know how far-reaching the idea of "ethically required...." goes,
but it has not been my experience or my observation that lawyers who
KNOW their client is guilty provide that "glaring knock down data" to a
court in a legal brief or in any other way. This also goes for my
experiences with and observation of Christian lawyers. By the same
token, I don't believe Phil Johnson would reveal any "glaring knock down
data" that defies his case.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 16 2002 - 10:24:42 EDT