Re: Ramblings on a "High View" of Scripture

From: gordon brown (gbrown@euclid.colorado.edu)
Date: Mon Apr 08 2002 - 18:35:28 EDT

Next message: Jonathan Clarke: "Re: Claims Intelligent Design Scientists Author Bibliography Papers"

Previous message: bivalve: "RE: Thoughts on the implications of evolution as a means of creation"
In reply to: PHSEELY@aol.com: "Re: Ramblings on a "High View" of Scripture"
Next in thread: Keith B Miller: "RE: Ramblings on a "High View" of Scripture"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, 7 Apr 2002 PHSEELY@aol.com wrote:

> Although some may affirm this article and then go to the interpretations of
> concordism to avoid such contextual historical-grammatical meanings as the
> sun being created on the fourth day and a universal Flood that killed every
> human on earth except the eight on the ark, the most natural course of action
> for a believer in this article would be to go directly to creation science.

This statement seems ironic since Henry Morris refused to sign the Chicago
statement.

Gordon Brown
Department of Mathematics
University of Colorado
Boulder, CO 80309-0395

Next message: Jonathan Clarke: "Re: Claims Intelligent Design Scientists Author Bibliography Papers"
Previous message: bivalve: "RE: Thoughts on the implications of evolution as a means of creation"
In reply to: PHSEELY@aol.com: "Re: Ramblings on a "High View" of Scripture"
Next in thread: Keith B Miller: "RE: Ramblings on a "High View" of Scripture"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 08 2002 - 18:35:40 EDT