From: Michael Roberts <topper@robertschirk.u-net.com>
> I first read the Genesis Flood in 1971 whne at L'Abri after I came back
from
> working as a geologist in africa for 3 years. Initially I thought it a
> powerful argument thogh it went against all my geology. However after a
few
> hours I started to spot misquotations and misrepresentations by the dozen.
> I would suggest that all YECs go through all YEC publications and correct
> the misquotations therein starting with the Genesis Flood by Morris and
> Whitcomb. I think that would sort out many of the problems and heat in the
> Creation/Evolution debate.
>
> I look forward to the 2nd edit of the Genesis Flood with no misquotations
Hi.
I mentioned your thoughts to some friends of mine. We agree that
misquotation is unacceptable. And we would be willing to study up on and
check out each of the quotes from the Genesis Flood which are considered to
be misquotations. Perhaps we can start with chaper 1 and work our way
through the book. I do not have a copy of the book, but I'm certrain an
among us we will have access to the book. It may be that someone has a web
site which deals with this topic and that can be a useful resource.
One point that needs to be agreed upon is just what exactly constitutes a
misquote. I imagine this may become clear as we consider each proposed
misquote.
Perhaps after finishing the Genesis Flood, we might take on "Shattering the
myths of Darwinism" by Milton. Then move back to some YEC book.
Allen
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 05 2002 - 20:24:44 EST