>Walt Hicks wrote:
>
>This 99% has always confused me in that is is a number that has been
>quoted for many years. Yet, it is my understanding that neither the
>chimpanzee nor human genome have been mapped to anywhere this degree of
>completeness. So what does this 99% mean? (I'm not arguing; I just don't
>understand.)
The two genomes are approximately 99% identical in what has been mapped thus
far. That is my understanding.
Another good question for Francis Collins.
Dick Fischer - The Origins Solution - www.orisol.com
"The answer we should have known about 150 years ago"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 25 2002 - 14:48:53 EST