RE: Children of YEC's in Sunday School (WAS: How to discuss evol ution with friends

From: Vandergraaf, Chuck (vandergraaft@aecl.ca)
Date: Wed Feb 13 2002 - 14:08:02 EST

  • Next message: Glenn Morton: "RE: 19th century YECs."

    George,

    One must be very careful with trying to stretch the "day" in Gen.1 to "ages"
    to accommodate an old earth. ["(For that matter, when talking with adults on
    whom the light is just beginning to dawn & who say, "Maybe the days were
    millions of years long", I don't try to introduce more sophisticated ideas -
    right then.)"] Some years ago, when I tried this tack, the response was
    something along the lines that plants need sunlight and that they would not
    survive a long night (assuming, of course, that the night was also "millions
    of years long"). I suppose one could argue for long days and short nights,
    but that has its own problems. ;-)

    Having thought about this for many years now (but not as long as some
    correspondents on this ASA site), I've come to the conclusion that it is
    hopeless to look for any agreement between what God shows us in His Creation
    and what Genesis appears to tell us at first glance (or, for many, even
    after 'n' glances). A more satisfying argument, to me, would be that God
    created the Universe some 6000 or so years ago as a fully functional system,
    with the stars 'way out there and the light well on its way to us, with all
    the daughter products of the U and Th series in place, with the isotopic
    signatures that we find, etc., etc. Note that I don't say I'd be happy with
    it, but I think I'd prefer it over "shoe horning" Genesis into geology or
    the other way around.

    Chuck Vandergraaf

    -----Original Message-----
    From: george murphy [mailto:gmurphy@raex.com]
    Sent: Wednesday February 13, 2002 12:39 PM
    To: Freeman, Louise Margaret
    Cc: asa@calvin.edu
    Subject: Re: Children of YEC's in Sunday School (WAS: How to discuss
    evolution with friends

    "Freeman, Louise Margaret" wrote:

    > George,
    >
    > Thank you for the thoughtful advice. A variation... how would you adapt
    this
    > advice for talking to children? I teach a Sunday School class of 1st and
    2nd
    > graders, and, although the pastoral leadership of the church is very
    > supportive of theistic evolution, the parents of several of my children
    are
    > committed YECs. The subject hasn't come up in my class yet but I'm sure
    it
    > will... in nothing more than the typical "were dinosaurs on Noah's ark?"
    type
    > questions.
    >
    > Is there a way to explain to small children that they don't have to choose
    > between the Bible and science without offending the beliefs of their
    parents?

            With this age it's probably best to deal with questions as they
    arise.
    Any attempt at a systematic comparison between what science says about
    origins &
    Genesis is likely just to be confusing. But you might have an exchange like
    this.

            "Were dinosaurs on Noah's ark?"
            "Probably not. People who study dinosaurs think that they all died
    a long
    time before the flood."
            If the response is just, "Oh" then let it ride. But you might get,
    e.g.,
    "Why did they die?" & you could talk briefly about asteroid impact. At
    some
    point the question of whether dinosaurs & people lived at the same time may
    come
    up, & then the whole question of time scale comes in.
            You could say that creation story in Genesis 1 is a story that tells
    us
    that God created the world but that it doesn't have all the details about
    how God
    did it. For this age I don't object to some modest concordism as a kind of
    temporary resting place. The days might be much longer than 24 hours & the
    other
    land animals were created before human beings (in the 1st account!) The
    "day-age"
    thing doesn't really work on close examination & I wouldn't "teach it", but
    in
    this context it's okay to suggest it as one way of thinking about things.
            (For that matter, when talking with adults on whom the light is just
    beginning to dawn & who say, "Maybe the days were millions of years long", I
    don't
    try to introduce more sophisticated ideas - right then.)
            Of course it's a tremendous help to have supportive pastoral
    backing.
    Perhaps it would be helpful to discuss with the pastor the possibility of
    him or
    her addressing the issue in an adult class or in a sermon.

    Shalom,

    George

    George L. Murphy
    http://web.raex.com/~gmurphy/
    "The Science-Theology Interface"



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 13 2002 - 14:08:23 EST