Re: Response to: What does the creation lack?

From: John W Burgeson (burgytwo@juno.com)
Date: Sun Nov 18 2001 - 18:41:42 EST

Next message: RDehaan237@aol.com: "Re: staged developmental creation"

Previous message: Glenn Morton: "Sweat in ungulates was: Glenn's comments"
Maybe in reply to: Peter Ruest: "Response to: What does the creation lack?"
Next in thread: Howard J. Van Till: "Re: Response to: What does the creation lack?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Peter wrote: "But biology, consciousness, and spirituality are _not_
reducible to
physics, unlike chemistry and astronomy."

While I agree with this, I need to see more than a simple claim to that
effect. On what grounds would you argue this?

John Burgeson (Burgy)

http://www.burgy.50megs.com
(science/theology, quantum mechanics, baseball, ethics,
humor, cars, God's intervention into natural causation, etc.)

Next message: RDehaan237@aol.com: "Re: staged developmental creation"
Previous message: Glenn Morton: "Sweat in ungulates was: Glenn's comments"
Maybe in reply to: Peter Ruest: "Response to: What does the creation lack?"
Next in thread: Howard J. Van Till: "Re: Response to: What does the creation lack?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Nov 18 2001 - 18:47:16 EST