Re: The ASA List

From: D. F. Siemens, Jr. (dfsiemensjr@juno.com)
Date: Mon Sep 17 2001 - 17:41:36 EDT

  • Next message: Terry M. Gray: "Testing...1...2...3...Testing (Please Ignore)"

    I tried to put this at the end, but the line simply kept lengthening.
    First, I think the list should be open to all, with the proviso that
    persistent disrupters, after warning, should be excluded. This should
    provide for maximum opportunity for dialogue yet prevent abuses. This
    seems easier on most of us than refraining from replying (for some
    perpetually hope for a breakthrough to rationality) and individually
    using "delete." Second, it is unfortunate that some folks are so petty
    that they cannot stand views dissonant with theirs. If I had not
    tolerated material with which, at the time, I strongly disagreed, I'd
    still be as ignorant as when I started out. I keep running across stuff
    that makes me say, "He may be right," or even, "She's got something
    there." I have also discovered that some things that don't touch me are
    highly relevant to others. So I rejoice in all who join the discussion
    genteelly.
    Dave

    On Mon, 17 Sep 2001 08:00:27 -0400 "Jack Haas" <haasJ@mediaone.net>
    writes in part:
    Greetings:
     
    I have been concerned with some discussion on the ASA list in the recent
    period. As one of the founders of the group I hoped that it would not end
    up at the rhetorical level of much (not all) of talk.origins.
     
    Until recently we have done reasonably well. On occasion, people have
    admitted that they were wrong or apologized when they went too far.
    Today, the list of contributors is, perhaps, more narrow than is healthy.
     
    I am more disturbed by the disruptive contributions of one or two non-ASA
    people who have severe mental problems. Private expressions of concern
    have had no effect on those with a 'mission.'
     
    Some are asking whether this sort of rhetoric should be part of a list
    supported by a Christian organization. One person has resigned from the
    ASA membership in protest. Do we risk failing in 'our mission?'
     
    How should we deal with disruptive participants?
     
    Remember that we are a un-moderated list which allows anyone to join and
    participate - without censorship.
     
    Jack Haas



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 17 2001 - 17:45:41 EDT