Re: God/math

From: George Hammond (ghammond@mediaone.net)
Date: Mon Sep 03 2001 - 21:45:55 EDT

Next message: george murphy: "Re: New thread: Mathematical truth (Was a sin-off of Re: How Einstein and Hammond proved God exists)"

Previous message: James W Stark: "Re: New thread: Mathematical truth"
In reply to: Lucy Masters: "God/math"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Lucy Masters wrote:

> "Proof" is a counter to "faith"

GH: Proof supersedes faith, obviously. Arguments
to the contrary represents the minority view.

> anyway - and certainly not a foundation for belief.

GH: Proof is belief. At least a Grand Jury
says so.

> Then to design a proof based upon a human
> invention is even more outrageous.

GH: Which is why Philosophy can't prove God.

GH: But Science can prove God, since Science
     is fact not invention. At least that is
     the majority view, and as usual the
     minority view can be safely disregarded
     with a mere "no comment".

> Lucy

-- 
Be sure to visit my website below
-----------------------------------------------------------
George Hammond, M.S. Physics
Email:    ghammond@mediaone.net
Website:  http://people.ne.mediaone.net/ghammond/index.html
-----------------------------------------------------------

Next message: george murphy: "Re: New thread: Mathematical truth (Was a sin-off of Re: How Einstein and Hammond proved God exists)"
Previous message: James W Stark: "Re: New thread: Mathematical truth"
In reply to: Lucy Masters: "God/math"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 03 2001 - 21:36:09 EDT