Re: A YEC apologetic (was "Antediluvian Period")

From: gordon brown (gbrown@euclid.colorado.edu)
Date: Thu Feb 08 2001 - 10:39:00 EST

  • Next message: Jonathan Clarke: "Re: A NT doctrine of creation (was canon within the canon)"

    On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Vernon Jenkins wrote:

    > "And the Lord God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden
    > thou mayest freely eat: but of the tree of the knowledge of good and
    > evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof
    > thou shalt surely die." (Gen.2:16,17)
    >
    >
    > Every age has raised its own echoes of the serpent's lie, but none more
    > so than our own. It is clear that for many Christians nowadays
    > interpretation of Holy Scripture has taken the place of the simple
    > literal acceptance of what God has to tell us. Man's 'Eden' experience
    > is wilfully ignored, as too are the stern warnings of 2Tim.3:15,16 and
    > 2Pet.3:16. It is therefore pertinent to ask why so many are persuaded
    > that, poetry and parables excepted, the Bible is not to be understood
    > literally? Indeed, the onus is surely upon them to explain to us why
    > they behave so.
    >

    Vernon,

    Since you believe that such stern warnings have been issued against anyone
    who doesn't take every statement in Scripture literally (except for
    parables and poetry), I want to know how you manage to interpret both
    of the words `day' and `die' literally in Gen. 2:17, which you quoted
    above.

    Gordon Brown
    Department of Mathematics
    University of Colorado
    Boulder, CO 80309-0395



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 08 2001 - 10:39:09 EST