" To defend Johnson in
the manner you are defending him seems to make Johnson look worse than he
actually does. I think he is ignorant of science and doesnt' care to
correct himself. Your defence of him makes him look like a sophist, a
deceitful individual or a mindless blabberer. That is truly a poor
defence
of someone you like."
Since I did not "defend" PJ, I don't at all see what you are writing
about.
Yes, I like PJ. And Michael Ruse, Paul Nelson, Al Plantinga, Stephen
Schafersman and a number of other people I interacted with at the NTSE,
some of whom are decidedly not theists. But I don't generally go around
"defending" any of them. First -- they can speak for themselves much
better than I. Second -- I am really only interesting in measuring their
claims.
Yes -- I like Glenn Morton too! < G >
Burgy
___________________________________________________________________
Get the Internet just the way you want it.
Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month!
Try Juno Web: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.